I welcomed in the new decade under a stunning blue moon here in Cambridge, and it’s got me to wondering whether the brand new year, and decade, that lie ahead of us might also be full of other rare and beautiful things.

2009 was undoubtedly the year when more people than ever before began paying attention to the problems of climate change. It was incredible to see these issues climb so high in the international agenda, even if the outcome might not yet be what most of us were hoping for.

But has all the talk about climate change distracted us from many of the other threats to the natural world?

Biodiversity – the wonderful diversity of wild species and the threats they face from human actions – is an issue that has been patiently waiting in the wings, waiting for the UN to push in out onto centre stage in 2010. Because this year is the UN International year of biodiversity.

The question is, will the dwindling populations of so many important, breathtaking, extraordinary species command as much global attention in 2010 as the climate change debate did in 2009.

Perhaps, if we’re lucky.

Coming up in the following months are a few major international meetings that could decide the fate of some of the world’s wildlife.

The international trade in bluefin tuna – highly prized for Japanese sushi – could be banned in March at the latest conference of CITES – the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. Following the failure last November of management bodies to take bold steps to help stop these magnificent fish being hunted to extinction, CITES could be the bluefin tuna’s last hope. But will countries with a vested interest in the trade be prepared to vote for a ban? The pessimist in me says, not likely.

Bluefin tuna on sale in Tsukiji Market, Tokyo. Photo by Sanctu

Also on the agenda at the CITES meeting will be a group of sharks that conservationists fear are being driven towards extinction by demand for their meat and most notably their fins, to be made into the Asian delicacy sharks fin soup. I’ve been working for the last 6 weeks assessing the proposals to have hammerheads, oceanic whitetips, spiny dogfish and porbeagle sharks join a trio of awesome sharks that already have trade restrictions – the basking sharks, whale sharks and great white sharks.

Hammerhead shark. Photo by gnuru

I’ll be blogging more about sharks and tuna this year, so watch this space.

Then, November will see another landmark UN meeting and with it another opportunity to make global deals that could help secure the future of the planet, this time at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity.

Back at the Rio Earth summit in 1992 nations pledged to put a halt to the loss of biodiversity. And they were going to do it by 2010.

Everyone knows that this has not happened – no where near it. We are barely even starting to understand how human actions are affecting biodiversity, let alone figure out ways of stopping extinction.

So this meeting will be a tricky one, but could be vital if a way forward for global action against extinction is to be found.

But ultimately what I hope this coming year will do is help people appreciate why biodiversity matters, just like many people in 2009 began to realise why climate change matters.

The link between biodiversity loss and our own lives may not be as obvious as the threats from climate change, but there are so many ways in which we depend on healthy, diverse, functioning ecosystems. And that’s something else I’ll be writing about more this year.

For now, Happy New Year to you all. May 2010 be full of rare and beautiful things for us all.

Could this be the end of the Chinese paddlefish?

This extraordinary aquatic giant wasn’t seen once during an intensive 3-year survey of the upper Yangtze River in China.

The Chinese paddlefish. A fish no more?

The last official reported sighting of the Chinese paddlefish was back in 2003. So, have they all gone now?

This bizarre species looks (or at least it did) a lot like a sawfish (a close relative of sharks and rays) with a huge long saw-like snout, or rostrum.

Chinese paddlefish have been measured at 3m long, while unconfirmed reports claim a 7m (22 feet) specimen weighing half a ton was found (that’s longer than three very tall men lying head to foot). Maybe they do grow that big, maybe they don’t. We may never know.

Because sadly we may never know much about Chinese paddlefish. They remain tremendously illusive with very few details uncovered about their habits. But it is thought that they probably spent time both in the sea as well as in rivers.

Overfishing and habitat destruction are named as the main culprits behind the demise of the Chinese paddlefish.

There was a possible sighting reported in Chinese newspapers earlier this year. But even so, with a team of keen-eyed scientists making every effort to find one – and failing – in the stretch of river they were most likely to hang out in, there is little doubt that there are hardly any of these magnificent beasts left in the wild.

If there are a few still hiding from us, there can’t be many.

And there aren’t even any in captivity.

What to do? Wave farewell?

Does this make the Chinese paddlefish the next on the list of species we have witnessed vanish, hot on the heals of the its former river-mate the Yangtze River dolphin?

If so, is there really anything we can do about it?

Scientists are talking about trying breeding programs, even artificial parthenogenesis. If only they could find a single, live female. Decide for yourself whether or not you think we should go to such extreme lengths to stop a single doomed species from being pushed over the edge.

A tiny part of me clutches onto a sliver of hope that there will still be Chinese paddlefish in the world in years to come. Just like I refuse to believe that I will one day wake up to the news that there are no more tigers or black rhinos or Philippine mahogany trees or any of the other critically endangered species there are.

But I’m afraid the pessimist in me seems to be winning on this one. I can’t really see how there is much chance the Chinese paddlefish will be with us for much longer, if indeed there are any out there right now. There are so many pressures crashing down on these fish – and many others species that live in the Yangtze. I just think we might be too late.

Flip side?

Is there a positive side to look on? Well, maybe.

While there may be not much hope for this particular species, I think we all need to reflect deeply on the possibility of another species lost. Stand (in your mind) on the banks of the River Yangtze, peer into the murky waters, and bid farewell to another creature gone, another fabulous product of natural selection.

It seems we never learn from our mistakes. But perhaps the story of the Chinese paddlefish could be one more reason to change that.

Because we’ve really got the stop this from happening. And not just for individual, charismatic species that we can admire and relate to, but for all creatures, great and small (as we used to sing in primary school assemblies), the species we may never meet and those we rely on in ways we may never know.

2010 is the year we said we’d reverse the tide of species loss. We’ve obviously not quite managed that yet. But I don’t think it’s time to give up.

In Detail:

• The Chinese paddlefish (Psephurus gladius) is one of only two known paddlefish, the sole members of the family Polyodontidae. The other species, the Mississippi paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) lives, as you might imagine, in rivers of southern United States.
• Photo of a tiny juvenile Chinese paddlefish.
• Link to paper: Zhang et al 2009.